Gallegos v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America

Filing 13

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Joint Motion Requesting Reassignment from Track 1 to Track 2 and for Telephonic Case Management Conference. The parties' request to reassign the case to Track Two is denied; the parties' request to attend the case management conference by telephone is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/13/2018. (APH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION TANYA GALLEGOS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:18-cv-345-FtM-38CM THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon review of the Joint Motion Requesting Reassignment from Track 1 to Track 2 and for Telephonic Case Management Conference filed on August 1, 2018. Doc. 12. The parties also request they be permitted to attend the case management conference by telephone. Id. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff filed this action on May 16, 2018 pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), for recovery of unpaid long-term disability benefits. Doc. 1. The Court entered a Related Case Order and Track One Notice on May 17, 2018. Doc. 2. On June 27, 2018, Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) filed its Answer, including a counterclaim alleging Plaintiff owes Prudential overpaid long-term disability benefits Plaintiff was not entitled to receive. Doc. 8. In the present motion, the parties jointly request the Court reassign the case to Track Two, asserting that “ERISA cases are usually Track 2[.]” Doc. 12 at 2. The motion includes a Case Management Report tailored to a Track Two case. Doc. 12-1. The parties also request that “if the court moves this case to Track 2,” they be allowed to hold the required case management conference “by telephone instead of live, since the parties have a finalized version of the Case Management Report already prepared.” Id. at 2. Under the Middle District of Florida Local Rules, “action[s] for review on an administrative record[,]” including ERISA cases, are categorized as Track One cases. M.D. Fla. R. 3.05(b)(1)(A). Accordingly, the Court’s Order on May 18, 2018 directed this case be designated as Track One. Doc. 2. Neither the joint motion nor Defendant’s counterclaim necessitates reassigning the case to Track Two. Therefore, the Court directs the parties to hold a new case management conference, which they may conduct by telephone, and file an amended Case Management Report tailored to a Track One ERISA case as described below. If the parties believe limited discovery is necessary in this case, they may propose appropriate deadlines in their amended Case Management Report. See Doc. 12 at 2. ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED: 1. The Joint Motion Requesting Reassignment from Track 1 to Track 2 and for Telephonic Case Management Conference (Doc. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. -2- 2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties either shall meet in person or by telephone for the purpose of completing an ERISA Case Management Report under Track One. 3. Within fourteen (14) days after the case management conference, the parties shall jointly file an ERISA Case Management Report, which shall include the following information: a. The proposed deadline by which Defendant will file and serve upon Plaintiff a copy of the Administrative Record; b. The proposed deadline by which the parties either shall file a stipulation as to the appropriate standard of review or a motion to determine same; c. Whether discovery is necessary and, if so, the proposed discovery deadline; d. The proposed deadline for filing the motion(s) for judgment on the record; e. The proposed deadline for filing the response(s) to the motion(s) for judgment on the record; f. The deadline for completing mediation and the name of the jointly-selected mediator, if applicable; and g. Any other issues that the parties believe will need resolution, including any requested accommodations or plans regarding disposition of Defendant’s counterclaim and proposed dates for any anticipated discovery. -3- DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 13th day of August, 2018. Copies: Counsel of record -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?