Hart et al v. Allergan, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting 28 Defendant Allergan, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend the Initial Disclosures Deadline. The parties shall have up to and including September 7, 2018 to serve mandatory initial disclosures. All other deadlines and directives set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order 27 remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/9/2018. (APH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PRECIOUS HART, LAVERNE HART, JAVONTA EDVARIS HART and THE ESTATE OF JAMES HART, individually and on behalf of the estate of James Hart, deceased Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:18-cv-353-FtM-29CM ALLERGAN, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendant Allergan, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend the Initial Disclosures Deadline filed on August 7, 2018. Doc. 28. Defendant requests to extend the August 7, 2018 initial disclosures deadline in the Case Management and Scheduling Order (“CMSO”) to September 7, 2018. Id. at 1. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. Rule 16 requires a showing of good cause for modification of a court’s scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The diligence of the moving party should be considered in determining whether there is good cause to extend a deadline.” Jozwiak v. Stryker Corp., No. 6:09-cv-1985-Orl-19GJK, 2010 WL 743834, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 26, 2010). In other words, the moving party must demonstrate it could not meet the deadline despite its diligent efforts. Sosa v. Airprint Sys., Inc., 133 F.3d 1417, 1418 (11th Cir. 1998); Idearc Media Corp. v. Kimsey & Assocs., P.A., No. 807-CV-1024-T-17EAJ, 2009 WL 413531, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2009). District courts have broad discretion when managing their cases, including discovery and scheduling. Johnson v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Ga., 263 F.3d 1234, 1269 (11th Cir. 2001). Here, Defendant seeks to extend the initial disclosures deadline in the CMSO (Doc. 27) to September 7, 2018. Doc. 28 at 1. Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion and Defendant notes that the parties previously agreed upon the September 7 deadline for initial disclosures. Id. Because the requested extension also will not affect any other deadlines in the CMSO, the Court finds good cause to extend the initial disclosures deadline to September 7, 2018. ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED: 1. Defendant Allergan, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Extend the Initial Disclosures Deadline (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. The parties shall have up to and including September 7, 2018 to serve mandatory initial disclosures. 2. All other deadlines and directives set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 27) remain in effect. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 9th day of August, 2018. Copies: Counsel of record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?