Melikhov et al v. Drab et al

Filing 144

ORDER adopting 117 Report and Recommendations. The Judgment Creditors' motion for writs of execution against nonparties Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA, LLC, and Hana Drabova 106 is DENIED IN PART and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter final judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 12/21/2020. (SMG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION ANTHONY MELIKHOV an individual; MELMAR HOLDINGS, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and U4G GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:19-cv-00248-JLB-MRM LADISLAV DRAB, an individual; CE GROUP, a foreign entity; ČESKÁ ENERGIE A.S., a foreign entity, and ČESKÁ PLYNÁRENSKÁ A.S., a foreign entity, Defendants. / ORDER The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this matter on September 28, 2020, recommending the Judgment Creditors’ motion for writs of execution against nonparties Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA, LLC, and Hana Drabova (Doc. 106) be denied in part and denied without prejudice in part. (Doc. 117.) No objections have been filed. A district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The factual findings in the R&R need not be reviewed de novo in the absence of an objection, but legal conclusions are always reviewed de novo. Id.; Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). After an independent review of the record—and noting that no objections have been filed—the Court agrees with the well-reasoned R&R. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 117) is ADOPTED. 2. The Judgment Creditors’ motion for writs of execution against nonparties Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA, LLC, and Hana Drabova (Doc. 106) is DENIED IN PART and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. 3. The Court DENIES the Judgment Creditors’ motion (Doc. 106) to the extent it seeks to recover the civil fine assessed by the Court against the nonparties for civil contempt (Doc. 54). 4. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Judgment Creditors’ motion (Doc. 106) to the extent it seeks to recover the Court’s previous awards of attorneys’ fees and costs. 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter final judgment in favor of the Judgment Creditors and against: a. Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA, LLC, and Hana Drabova in the amount of $42,466.50 in attorneys’ fees and $1,549.39 in costs (Doc. 87 at 11). b. Judgment Debtor Ladislav Drab in the amount of $2,966.50 in attorneys’ fees (Doc. 99 at 5; Doc. 109 at 5). 2 6. After the Clerk of Court enters final judgments as directed above, the Judgment Creditors may renew their motion for writs of execution solely as to these awards of attorneys’ fees. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, on December 21, 2020. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?