Tacy v. Secretary, DOC (Collier County)
OPINION AND ORDER denying 62 Motion for objection to Opinion and Order, construed as a motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/15/2021. (RKR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
TIMOTHY J. TACY, SR.,
OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner Timothy J. Tacy, Sr.’s Motion
for Objection to This Court’s Opinion and Order (Doc. #62), which
the Court interprets as a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s
March 5, 2021 Order (Doc. #61).
That Order denied an earlier
motion for reconsideration.
Tacy filed this habeas case to challenge a state conviction
and sentence stemming from a motor vehicle collision that occurred
McDonald’s restaurants have cameras in their drive-throughs, Tacy
surmised that the crime might have been recorded.
filed a slew of motions based on that belief.
He has since
In this latest
Motion, Tacy suggests the Court should “get off its ‘high horse’
and call McDonalds and see if there is ‘robbery video’ in its
(Doc. #62 at 2).
As in Tacy’s prior motion for reconsideration, he does not
reconsideration of the Court’s order.
See Gold Cross EMS, Inc.
v. Children’s Hosp. of Ala., 108 F. Supp. 3d 1376, 1384 (S.D. Ga.
2015); see also PaineWebber Income Props. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 902
F. Supp. 1514, 1521 (M.D. Fla. 1995).
The Motion merely rehashes
issues the Court already addressed, so the Court will deny it.
Tacy’s Habeas Petition is fully briefed, and the Court will address
it in due course.
Accordingly, it is now
Petitioner Timothy J. Tacy, Sr.’s Motion for Objection to
This Court’s Opinion and Order (Doc. #62) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on July 15, 2021.
Copies: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?