Olga Baker #2, LLC v. Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest

Filing 6

ORDERED: Defendant Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest must SUPPLEMENT the Notice of Removal on or before October 28, 2020, to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this Order will cause this case being remanded without further notice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/14/2020. (AEH)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00792-SPC-MRM Document 6 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID 478 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION OLGA BAKER #2, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-792-FtM-38MRM ACE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest’s Notice of Removal. (Doc. 1). This lawsuit arises from an alleged breach of the insurance policy providing coverage to Plaintiff Olga Baker #2, LLC’s property (“the LLC”) issued by Ace Insurance. The LLC claims a breach because Ace Insurance failed to fully compensate the LLC for damage to the property caused by Hurricane Irma. The LLC first sued Ace Insurance in state court. Ace Insurance removed the case to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction. Removal permits a defendant to move a case from a state court to a federal district court when the federal court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). A removing defendant bears the burden of proving Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. 1 Case 2:20-cv-00792-SPC-MRM Document 6 Filed 10/14/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID 479 proper federal jurisdiction. Leonard v. Enter. Rent a Car, 279 F.3d 967, 972 (11th Cir. 2002). “Because removal jurisdiction raises significant federalism concerns, federal courts are directed to construe removal statutes strictly” and resolve “all doubts about jurisdiction…in favor of remand to state court.” Univ. of S. Ala. V. Am. Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 405, 411 (11th Cir. 1999)(citations omitted). Diversity jurisdiction is one type of original jurisdiction. A federal court has diversity jurisdiction if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and the parties are citizens of different states. Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255, 1261 (11th Cir. 2000). Here, Ace Insurance has not shown diversity of citizenship between the parties. It says “Plaintiff is an Illinois based limited liability company.” (Doc. 1 at 2). For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company is not, without more, a citizen of the state that created the entity or the state where it has its principal place of business; such legal entities are citizens of every state in which each of their members are citizens. Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004)(emphasis added)(citations omitted)(for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company is a citizen of any state in which each of their members are citizens); see also Mutual Assignment and Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004)(“Lind-Waldock is a limited liability company, which means that it is a citizen of every state of which any member is a citizen; this may need to be traced through multiple levels if any of its members is itself a 2 Case 2:20-cv-00792-SPC-MRM Document 6 Filed 10/14/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID 480 partnership or LLC.”). Because there are no allegations to support the state citizenship of each member of the LLC, Ace Insurance has not adequately pleaded diversity of citizenship. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest must SUPPLEMENT the Notice of Removal on or before October 28, 2020, to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this Order will cause this case being remanded without further notice. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on October 14, 2020. Copies: All Parties of Record 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?