Sanchez v. Marra Construction, Inc.
ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion for Clerk's Default Against Marra Construction, Inc. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 6/3/2021. (brh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
Case No. 2:21-cv-255-JES-NPM
MARRA CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Before the Court is a Motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 9). Plaintiff Dominic
Sanchez requests the Court direct the Clerk to enter a default against Marra
Construction, Inc. No response was filed to the motion and the response time has
lapsed. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the motion without
“When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has
failed to plead or otherwise defend and that failure is shown by affidavit or
otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Before
directing the clerk to enter a default, however, the Court must determine whether
Plaintiff properly effected service of process, for which Plaintiff bears the burden of
proof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l); Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC, No. 2:13-CV-809-
FTM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014); Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F.
S.R.L., No. 6:13-CV-1811-ORL-37, 2014 WL 1400641, *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10,
Service on an entity defendant can be made by any manner prescribed in Rule
4(e)(1) by “following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts
of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service
is made.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(A) & 4(e)(1); see also Chambers, 2014 WL
3721209, at *1. Or, service can be effected “by delivering a copy of the summons
and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent
authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process . . . .” Fed. R. Civ.
P. 4(h)(1). Likewise, under state law, a corporation may be served through its
registered agent. Fla. Stat. § 48.081(3)(a). Section 48.081(3)(a) also provides that a
person attempting service may serve process on any employee of the registered agent
on the first attempt at service. Id. On April 1, 2021, the process server served Marra
Construction, Inc. by serving Blaise Marra. While the process server states Blaise
Marra is a person authorized to accept service, she does not indicate that he is an
employee of the registered agent. (Doc. 8). Thus, the Court cannot determine if
service of process was properly effected on Marra Construction, Inc.
Accordingly, the Motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 9) is DENIED without
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on June 3, 2021.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?