Noshirvan v. Couture et al

Filing 126

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 96 Motion to Compel Defendant Jennifer Couture to Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce Documents; DENIED AS MOOT to the extent the parties have resolved specific discovery reque sts; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 97 Motion to Compel Defendant Central Park of Southwest Florida, LLC to Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce Documents; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 98 Motion to Compel Defendant Ra lph Garramone M.D. to Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce Documents; DENIED AS MOOT to the extent the parties have resolved specific discovery requests. The Court declines to award fees under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 8/28/2024. (CGW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
DANESH NOSHIRVAN, an
individual,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.: 2:23-cv-1218-JES-KCD

JENNIFER COUTURE, RALPH
GARRAMONE M.D., RALPH
GARRAMONE M.D. P.A.,
CENTRAL PARK OF
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC,
WRAITH, LLC, SULLIVAN
STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC,
HAIRPIN TURN, LLC, OMG
REALTY, LLC, R G WEIGHT
MANAGEMENT, LLC, CENTRAL
PARK SOUTH, LLC, BRANTLEE,
LLC, LEGACY OF MARIE
GARRAMONE, LLC,
GARRAMONE MARKETING,
INC., 5681 DIVISION LLC, THE
LAW OFFICE OF PATRICK
TRAINOR ESQ. LLC, PATRICK
TRAINOR and ANTI-DOXING
LEAGUE INC.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case was before the Court for oral argument on three pending
discovery motions. (Docs. 96, 97, 98.) For the reasons stated on the record, it is
now ORDERED:

1.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Jennifer Couture to

Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce Documents (Doc.
96) is DENIED AS MOOT to the extent the parties have resolved specific
discovery requests. The motion is otherwise GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART as stated on the record.
2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Central Park of Southwest

Florida, LLC to Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce
Documents (Doc. 97) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Ralph Garramone M.D. to

Provide Better Responses, Overrule Objections, and Produce Documents (Doc.
98) is DENIED AS MOOT to the extent the parties have resolved specific
discovery requests. The motion is otherwise GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART as stated on the record.
4.

The Court declines to award fees under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.

ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 28, 2024.

Copies: All Parties of Record

2