Arch Insurance Company, a Missouri corporation v. Security Real Estate Services, Inc., f/k/a Fairfield Financial Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Filing 131

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion to extend time; striking 117 Motion to extend time; striking 121 Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard T. Snyder on 4/15/2009. (CF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION GOODBYS CREEK, LLC, a Florida limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on Goodbys Creek, LLC's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines, Agreed in Part (Doc. #115; Motion). A hearing was held on the Motion on April 13, 2009. Having heard the positions of the parties, and being otherwise fully informed in the premises, the Motion is GRANTED to the extent the discovery deadline is extended through May 29, 2009, and the dispositive motion deadline is reset to June 8, 2009. The parties CASE NO. 3:07-cv-947-J-34HTS are, of course, permitted to undertake discovery at any time pursuant to their own agreement. However, doing so "anticipates no discovery disputes; the Court will not hear discovery disputes arising during such extended period." Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. #55) at 1 (emphasis omitted). Additionally, based in part on the representations made at the hearing, the Motion for Additional Time to Examine Arch Corporate Representative by Deposition (Doc. #117) and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and For Sanctions (Doc. #121) are STRICKEN for failure to comply fully with Rule 3.01(g), Local Rules, United States District Court, Middle District of Florida. Cf. Order (Doc. #89). DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 15th day of April, 2009. /s/ Howard T. Snyder HOWARD T. SNYDER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies to: Counsel of record and pro se parties, if any -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?