Sandiford et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER granting 21 Motion to substitute party. Signed by Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/1/2009. (BEE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION Glorida Sandiford, Plaintiff, vs. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _____________________________________/ Case No. 3:08-cv-294-J-MCR
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Substitute Party (Doc. 21) filed on September 22, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion requests that Phillip Newton, father of deceased Plaintiff Gloria Sandiford, be substituted as the party of record. As stated in this Court's previous Orders (Docs. 18, 22), 42 U.S.C. § 404(d), entitled "Payment to survivors or heirs when eligible person is deceased," describes the various classes of persons, in descending order of priority, who may receive any outstanding benefits administered by the Social Security Administration and owed to a decedent. See Peers v. Apfel, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18487 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); 42 U.S.C. § 404(d)(1-7). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 404(d)(3), Mr. Newton is the proper party to pursue Plaintiff Sandiford's claim for benefits because counsel for Plaintiff represents
that Plaintiff Sandiford did not leave either a surviving spouse or any surviving children.1 (Doc. 23). Accordingly, after due consideration, it is ORDERED: 1. 2. Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Substitute Party (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to change the caption of this case to reflect the
correct name of the plaintiff.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Jacksonville, Florida this 1st day of October, 2009.
MONTE C. RICHARDSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies to: Counsel of Record
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 404(d)(1-3), a parent of the deceased may only be entitled to the deceased's claim for benefits if the deceased leaves no surviving spouse or children.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?