Quick v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 40

ORDER overruling 38 Objections and adopting 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 25 and 33 MOTION to dismiss; dismissing case without prejudice; denying as moot all other pending motions; directing Clerk to close the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 5/31/2011. (MGG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION RICHARD LEE QUICK, JR., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:10-cv-133-J-32JBT MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER This case is before the Court on defendant’s Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 25 and 33) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, and pro se plaintiff’s responses thereto (Doc. 28 and 36). The assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37), recommending that defendant’s Motions to Dismiss be granted and that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) to which defendant responded (Doc. 39). Upon independent review of the file, and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 37), the Court finds plaintiff’s objections are due to be overruled and the Report and Recommendation adopted as the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) are OVERRULED and the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 25 and 33) are GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s case is dismissed without prejudice. 4. All other pending motions are denied as moot. 5. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida this 31st day of May, 2011. s. Copies: Honorable Joel B. Toomey United States Magistrate Judge counsel of record pro se plaintiff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?