Regions Bank v. Beemer & Associates XVII, L.C. et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 43 Motion to strike. Beemer & Associates XVII, L.C.'s demand for jury trial is STRICKEN from ANSWER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey on 12/14/2010. (ADM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION REGIONS BANK, Plaintiff, v. BEEMER & ASSOCIATES XVII, L.C., et al., Defendants. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Regions Bank's ("Regions") Motion to Strike Defendant's Demand for Jury Trial with Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. 43) ("Motion") and Defendant Beemer & Associates XVII, L.C.'s ("Beemer XVII") Response thereto (Doc. 46) ("Response"). On October 15, 2010, the Court entered an Order striking Defendants' demand for jury trial from the Answer (Doc. 27), except as to Defendants, Las Vegas Self Storage, Inc. and Beemer XVII. (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff now moves to strike the demand for jury trial asserted by Beemer XVII. (Doc. 43.) In its Response, Beemer XVII concedes that it signed a conspicuous written waiver of its right to jury trial, but opposes the relief sought in the Motion "to the extent the Court should find that Regions has waived its right to enforce the contractual waiver, on account of laches." (Doc. 46.) The Court does not find that Regions has waived its right to enforce Beemer XVII's written waiver of the right to jury trial. The case cited in the Response, Madura v. Countrywide Home Loans, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11422 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2008), finding that the defendants waived their right to enforce a jury trial waiver provision, id. at *2-3, is CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00577-J-99TJC-JBT 1 distinguishable. In Madura: not only did Defendants wait for more than a year before seeking to enforce the jury trial waiver provision, but they also indicated on their case management report . . . that Plaintiffs demanded a jury trial (and they did not indicate their objection thereto) and they failed to object to the Court's scheduling orders setting this case for a jury trial. Id. at 2. In the present case, the Motion was filed less than two months after the initial Motion to Strike (Doc. 37) was filed. Plaintiff explains this short delay adequately by noting that it did not realize Beemer XVII had demanded a jury trial in the Answer, and that the parties agreed in the Case Management Report that "[a]ll of the Defendants, with the exception of Las Vegas Self Storage, Inc. agree that they are not entitled to a jury trial." (Doc. 34 at 2.) Under these circumstances, Regions has not waived its right to enforce Beemer XVII's written waiver of the right to jury trial and, thus, the Motion is due to be granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Regions Bank's Motion to Strike Defendant's Demand for Jury Trial (Doc. 43) is GRANTED. 2. Beemer XVII's demand for jury trial is STRICKEN from the Answer (Doc. 27), as amended (Doc. 42). DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, on December 14, 2010. Copies to: Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?