Ebron v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Filing
37
ORDER adopting 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 34 Defendant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 4/7/2014. (BJB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
MARCUS DARNELL EBRON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 3:12-cv-272-J-32JBT
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
ENFORCEMENT,
Defendant.
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Defendant United States Immigration and
Customs Enforcement’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
(Doc. 34), to which Plaintiff Marcus Darnell Ebron has responded (Doc. 35).
On
March 3, 2014, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 36) recommending that the motion be granted and that the
Second Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.
No objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); M.D. Fla. R. 6.02(a).
Upon
independent review of the file, and for the reasons stated in the Report and
Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 36), it is therefore hereby
ORDERED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 36) is
ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
2.
Defendant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 34) is GRANTED.
3.
The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The
Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 7th day of April, 2014.
bjb
Copies to:
Honorable Joel B. Toomey
United States Magistrate Judge
Pro se plaintiff
Counsel of record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?