Hooks v. Geico General Insurance Company, Inc.

Filing 169

ORDER adopting 168 Report and Recommendation; granting, in part, and denying, in part, 153 Defendant's Motion for Award of Costs. The entry of an order directing the Clerk of the Court to tax costs is stayed pending the resolution of 159 Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 1/4/2016. (JW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JOHN F. HOOKS, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 3:13-cv-891-J-34JBT GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ________________________________________ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 168; Report), entered on November 23, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Toomey recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Award of Costs (Dkt. No. 153; Motion) be granted, in part, and denied, in part. See Report at 15. No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has now passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 168) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Award of Costs (Dkt. No. 153) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. a. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Court determines that Defendant, as the prevailing party, is entitled to recoup costs in the amount of $12,037.96. b. 3. Otherwise, the Motion is DENIED. The entry of an order directing the Clerk of the Court to tax costs in this amount is STAYED pending the resolution of Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial (Dkt. No. 159). DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 4th day of January, 2016. ja Copies to: The Honorable Joel B. Toomey United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?