Jones v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Program No. 1 et al

Filing 63

ORDER adopting 62 Report and Recommendation; granting 58 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 60 Defendants' Motion to Deem Unopposed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 2/7/2018. (JW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION SHERRI JONES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:15-cv-821-J-34JRK AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1 and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendants. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62; Report), entered by the Honorable James R. Klindt, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 10, 2018. In the Report, Judge Klindt recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Statement of Undisputed Facts and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 58) be granted, that Defendants’ Motion to Deem Unopposed Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 60) be granted, and that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. See Report at 23. Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Report, and the time for doing so has now passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the finding or recommendations by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de -1- novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Statement of Undisputed Facts and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 58) is GRANTED. 3. Defendants’ Motion to Deem Unopposed Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 60) is GRANTED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants, terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot, and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 7th day of February, 2018. ja Copies to: Counsel of Record Pro Se Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?