Lizarzabal v. Lynch et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 2/4/2016. (BL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION HENDRIX LIZARZABAL, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 3:15-cv-1307-J-34JBT LORETTA LYNCH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE On November 2, 2015, Petitioner Hendrix Lizarzabal filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Petition; Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In the Petition, Lizarzabal seeks his release from the custody of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Respondents to On respond December to the 7, 2015, Petition the Court within directed sixty days. Lizarzabal’s copy of the Order was returned to the Court as undeliverable with the notation “released” on December 15, 2015. On February 1, 2016, Respondents filed a Notice of Removal (Notice; Doc. 8) with an exhibit (Resp. Ex. A, Declaration of Deportation Officer Hector H. Diaz-Martinez). In the Notice, they assert that Lizarzabal was removed from the United States on December 24, 2015, see Resp. Ex. A, is no longer in the custody of ICE, and as such, his case should be dismissed, see Notice at 1. The Court concludes that this case no longer presents a case or controversy, and therefore the dismissal of this case is appropriate at this time. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. 2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, closing the case and terminating any pending motions. 3. The Clerk of Court shall send Lizarzabal a copy of this Order to his last known address on file with this Court (Baker County Detention Center). DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 4th day of February, 2016. sc 2/2 c: Hendrix Lizarzabal Counsel of Record - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?