Paola Canas et al v. Flash Dancers, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER denying in part 39 Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude the Opinion and Testimony of Defendants' Experts Darren Franclemont and Mark Zablow; denying 40 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 41 Consolidated Defendants ' Motion to Exclude the Reports of Plaintiffs' Expert Stephen Chamberlin and Martin Buncher; dismissing Counts V and VI of 30 the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 9/19/2018. (JJB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PAOLA CANAS, LINA POSADA, JESSICA BURCIAGA, JAIME EDMONDSON, and ROSIE JONES, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:16-cv-393-J-32JRK FLASH DANCERS, INC. and MICHAEL TOMKOVICH, Defendants. ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 40), Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude the Opinion and Testimony of Defendants’ Experts Darren Franclemont and Mark Zablow, (Doc. 39), and Consolidated Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Reports of Plaintiffs’ Expert Stephen Chamberlin and Martin Buncher, (Doc. 41). The parties responded to each motion. (Docs. 43; 45; 46). On September 19, 2018, the Court held a hearing, the record of which is incorporated herein. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude the Opinion and Testimony of Defendants’ Experts Darren Franclemont and Mark Zablow, (Doc. 39), is DENIED IN PART and taken under advisement in part. Zablow is permitted to testify as an expert. If Defendants seek to have Franclemont testify, he will be required to proffer his testimony outside the presence of the jury and the Court will make a decision concerning his ability to testify at that time. 3. Consolidated Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Reports of Plaintiffs’ Expert Stephen Chamberlin and Martin Buncher, (Doc. 41), is DENIED. 4. At Plaintiffs’ request and with Defendants’ consent, Count V of the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint, (Doc. 30), alleging violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, § 501.204, Fla. Stat. is DISMISSED. 5. At Plaintiffs’ request and with Defendants’ consent, Count VI of the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint, (Doc. 30), alleging Civil Theft in violation of §§ 812.014 and 772.11, Fla. Stat. is DISMISSED. 6. At the hearing, Plaintiffs disclaimed any attempt to seek punitive damages on any count. 2 7. This case is set to proceed to trial on Counts I–IV, and VII of the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint, (Doc. 30). The trial schedule and coordinating instructions to be issued via a separate order. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 19th day of September, 2018. TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN United States District Judge jb Copies to: Counsel of record 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?