Doolin v. American Optical Corporation et al
ORDER denying 25 Defendant BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC's Motion to Dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 10/11/2016. (MHM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
STACEY DOOLIN, as the
Personal Representative of the
Estate of Richard E. Doolin,
Case No. 3:16-cv-778-J-34PDB
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION,
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Wrongful Death Complaint and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law (Doc. 25; Motion), filed on August 9, 2016. Plaintiff filed a response
in opposition to the Motion on August 23, 2016. See Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant
Borg-Warner Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Wrongful Death
Complaint (Doc. 33; Response). Accordingly this matter is ripe for review.
In the Motion, Defendant BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC (Defendant) raises a single
basis for dismissal of Plaintiff’s Amended Wrongful Death Complaint and Demand for Jury
Trial (Doc. 4; Amended Complaint)—that in filing this action, Plaintiff failed to comply with
the requirements of Florida’s Asbestos and Silica Compensation Fairness Act (the Act).
See Motion at 2-3 (citing Fla. Stat. §§ 774.205(3) and 774.207(2)). In response, Plaintiff
notes that two jurists within the Middle District of Florida have determined that the
procedural requirements of the Act are inapplicable in federal court. See Response at 2
(citing Dugas v. 3M Co., No: 3:14-cv-1096-J-39JBT (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2015) (order on
motions to dismiss) and Hughes v. Am. Tripoli, Inc., No. 2:04-cv-485-FtM-29DNF (M.D.
Fla. May 30, 2006) (order on motions to dismiss)). Defendant has cited no contrary
authority. Indeed, rather than attempt to do so, Defendant filed a motion seeking leave to
amend or supplement its Motion to add an additional basis for dismissal or alternatively a
request for a more definite statement. See Defendant BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC’s
Motion for Leave to Amend or Supplement its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Wrongful Death Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 31).
In doing so, Defendant appears to acknowledge the inapplicability of the Act’s procedural
requirements to actions filed in federal court. See id. at 3 (stating “Plaintiff’s failure to
attach the sworn information form alone may not warrant dismissal of her Amended
Complaint in [federal] court . . . .”). Persuaded by the reasoning of my colleagues in
Dugas and Hughes, the undersigned determines that the Motion is due to be denied.
Accordingly, it is
Defendant BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Wrongful Death Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 25) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 11th day of October, 2016.
Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?