Milledge v. Tucker et al
Filing
150
ORDER denying 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration; if Plaintiff chooses to file a supplemental response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, he must do so by July 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 6/28/2019. (KLC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
COREY MILLEDGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:17-cv-483-J-39MCR
KENNETH S. TUCKER, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________
ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 149) is DENIED.
Plaintiff has been afforded sufficient time to review his medical
and mental health records. See Order (Doc. 140). Defendants certify
they have no additional records to disclose (Doc. 142). Plaintiff’s
efforts to conduct discovery and investigate the facts have not
been blocked or denied. Cf. Smith v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 713 F.3d
1059, 1064 (11th Cir. 2013) (holding the district court abused its
discretion in finding plaintiff presented insufficient evidence in
response to a motion for summary judgment when the defendants
“effectively blocked” the plaintiff’s efforts to obtain evidence).
If Plaintiff chooses to file a supplemental response to
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 128), he must do so
by July 12, 2019. If Plaintiff files no supplement, the Court will
rule on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the record
currently
before
the
Court.
This
Court
received
Plaintiff’s
response to the Motion for Summary Judgment on March 8, 2019 (Docs.
135, 136). The Court would like to reach the merits of the Motion
without further delay.
DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 27th day of
June, 2019.
Jax-6
c:
Corey Milledge
Counsel of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?