Milledge v. Tucker et al

Filing 150

ORDER denying 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration; if Plaintiff chooses to file a supplemental response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, he must do so by July 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 6/28/2019. (KLC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION COREY MILLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-483-J-39MCR KENNETH S. TUCKER, et al., Defendants. ______________________________ ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 149) is DENIED. Plaintiff has been afforded sufficient time to review his medical and mental health records. See Order (Doc. 140). Defendants certify they have no additional records to disclose (Doc. 142). Plaintiff’s efforts to conduct discovery and investigate the facts have not been blocked or denied. Cf. Smith v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 713 F.3d 1059, 1064 (11th Cir. 2013) (holding the district court abused its discretion in finding plaintiff presented insufficient evidence in response to a motion for summary judgment when the defendants “effectively blocked” the plaintiff’s efforts to obtain evidence). If Plaintiff chooses to file a supplemental response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 128), he must do so by July 12, 2019. If Plaintiff files no supplement, the Court will rule on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the record currently before the Court. This Court received Plaintiff’s response to the Motion for Summary Judgment on March 8, 2019 (Docs. 135, 136). The Court would like to reach the merits of the Motion without further delay. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 27th day of June, 2019. Jax-6 c: Corey Milledge Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?