Jurec v. Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.

Filing 59

ORDER Adopting 56 Report and Recommendations and denying 48 Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. No later than August 2, 2019, Defendant will answer Count II of the SAC. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 7/11/2019. (SEJ) Modified on 7/11/2019 to edit text per Chambers. (TMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION BENJAMIN JUREC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:18-cv-591-J-32JRK WALTER P. RAWL & SONS, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation, Defendant. ORDER This case is before the Court on the Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48). On June 17, 2019, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) recommending that the motion be denied. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); M.D. Fla. R. 6.02(a). Upon de novo review and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56), it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48) is DENIED. No later than August 2, 2019, Defendant will answer Count II of the SAC.1 3. The parties remain governed by the Second Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 46), as amended (Doc. 54). DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida the 11th day of July, 2019. TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN United States District Judge sej Copies to: Honorable James R. Klindt United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of record 1 Defendant has already answered Count I of the SAC. (Doc. 47). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?