Retzer v. Bradshaw et al
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation; dismissing case without prejudice; directing the Clerk of the Court to close the file. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 10/10/2019. (JW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ANDREW H. RETZER,
Case No. 3:19-cv-848-J-34PDB
FRANK BRADSHAW and
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4;
Report), entered by the Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale, United States Magistrate Judge,
on September 16, 2019. In the Report, Judge Barksdale recommends that this case be
dismissed without prejudice. See Report at 2. Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the
Report, and the time for doing so has passed.
The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific
objections to findings of fact are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo
review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993);
see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions
de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994);
United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615 at *1 (M.D. Fla.
May 14, 2007).
Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate
Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions
recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is
ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and
deadlines as moot and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 10th day of October, 2019.
Counsel of Record
Pro Se Parties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?