Jackson v. Chapter 13 Trustee

Filing 10

ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Appellant's Judicial Notice to the extent Appellant requests affirmative relief from the Court. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 11/26/2024.(DB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION DEION NATHANIEL JACKSON, Appellant, v. Case No. 3:24-cv-00737-MMH CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Appellee. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Appellant’s Judicial Notice (Doc. 9) filed on November 14, 2024. In the Judicial Notice, Plaintiff challenges the presence of Appellee’s attorney, Mr. John J. Freeman, Jr., in this case and requests a $10 million sanction against Appellee. Doc. 9 at 1-2, Judicial Notice. Further, Appellant requests that the Court “null and void all of the Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings, within the bankruptcy court.” Id. The request is due to be denied for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Rule 8013(a)(2)(A) provides that “[a] motion must state with particularity the grounds for the motion, the relief sought, and the legal argument necessary to support it.” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8013(a)(2)(A). The Judicial Notice requests affirmative relief from the Court but provides no legal argument to support granting such relief. Thus, the Court will not entertain Appellant’s requests at this time. Appellant is advised that, if he wishes to pursue relief, he is required to file an appropriate motion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: To the extent Appellant requests affirmative relief from the Court in the Judicial Notice (Doc. 9) such request is DENIED without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 26th day of November, 2024. Lc34 Copies to: Pro Se Party Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?