Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing case without prejudice; directing Clerk to close the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 6/13/2011. (MGG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
GREG GAMACHE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 5:11-cv-125-Oc-32JBT
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) and Affidavit of
Indigency (Doc. 2), which the Court construes as a motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Upon review of these filings, the assigned
United States Magistrate Judge directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint and warned
plaintiff that failure to comply could result in the Magistrate Judge recommending that his
complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Doc. 4). Plaintiff failed to further amend his
complaint or to file any other response to the Court’s Order and on April 15, 2011, the
Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff’s
complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Doc. 6). No objections were filed and the
time in which to do so has now passed.
Accordingly, upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the
Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 6), it is hereby
ORDERED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) of the Magistrate Judge is
ADOPTED in full as the opinion of the Court.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
3.
This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to
Local Rule 3.10(a). The Clerk shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida this 13th day of June, 2011.
mg.
Copies:
Honorable Joel B. Toomey
United States Magistrate Judge
pro se plaintiff
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?