Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing case without prejudice; directing Clerk to close the file. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 6/13/2011. (MGG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION GREG GAMACHE, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 5:11-cv-125-Oc-32JBT FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) and Affidavit of Indigency (Doc. 2), which the Court construes as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Upon review of these filings, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint and warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in the Magistrate Judge recommending that his complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Doc. 4). Plaintiff failed to further amend his complaint or to file any other response to the Court’s Order and on April 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Doc. 6). No objections were filed and the time in which to do so has now passed. Accordingly, upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 6), it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED in full as the opinion of the Court. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 3. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10(a). The Clerk shall close the file. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida this 13th day of June, 2011. mg. Copies: Honorable Joel B. Toomey United States Magistrate Judge pro se plaintiff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?