Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Flaskey et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting [Doc. 21] Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve process on Defendant John W. Dixon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 7/18/2012. (AR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:12-CV-183-Oc-32PRL MICHAEL FLASKEY, GLEN E. FUTRELL, JOHN W. DIXON, UNKNOWN PARTY/PARTIES IN POSSESSION, THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PINE ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT and BELLA COLLINA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED Defendants. ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion for an extension of time to serve process on Defendant John W. Dixon. (Doc. 21). On March 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint (Doc. 1) and summonses were issued. (Doc. 3). Pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P., service of the summons and complaint must be made within 120 days after filing the complaint. However, the Court has discretion to extend the time for service. See Fed.R.Civ.P.4(m); Horenkamp v. Van Winkle and Co., Inc., 402 F.3d 1129, 1132-33 (11th Cir. 2005)(holding that court may extend the time for service of process under Rule 4(m) even in the absence of a showing of good cause). Plaintiff represents that despite diligent efforts, it has been unable to serve Defendant, John W. Dixon. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks a 60-day extension of time to effect service of process. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant, John W. Dixon on or before September 18, 2012. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on July 18, 2012. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?