U.S. Nutraceuticals LLC et al v. Cyanotech Corporation et al

Filing 89

ORDER denying 88 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/12/2013. (JWM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
U.S. NUTRACEUTICALS LLC and
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 5:12-cv-366-Oc-10PRL

CYANOTECH CORPORATION and
NUTREX HAWAII, INC.
Defendants.

ORDER
This case comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Reconsideration of Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery
(Doc. 88). Plaintiffs object to the Court’s Order dated November 7, 2013 granting a
three (3) month extension of discovery, dispositive motion deadlines, and trial dates.
Plaintiffs argue that the Court’s Order was premised on a series of inaccurate factual
statements by Defendants, that Defendants “chose to stonewall discovery for months on
end,” and that Defendants failed to show good cause for modifying the scheduling
order.
As already explained in the Court’s Order (Doc. 87), good cause exists for
modification of the case management deadlines. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration
(Doc. 88) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on November 12, 2013.

Copies fu
urnished to:
Counsel of Record
sented Parties
e
Unrepres

-2-