S & S Packing, Inc. v. Spring Lake Ratite Ranch, Inc.

Filing 76

ORDER to respond. On or before December 9, 2016, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's 75 motion to supplement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 12/2/2016. (CAB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION S & S PACKING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:13-cv-386-Oc-10PRL SPRING LAKE RATITE RANCH, INC. Defendant. ORDER On October 28, 2016, I entered a Report and Recommendation on Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees in this Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499a, et. seq., (“PACA”) case. (Doc. 74). Plaintiff has now filed an objection to my report, in which it requests an opportunity to supplement its opposition to Defendant’s requested fees. (Doc. 75). Specifically, Plaintiff asks for another chance to identify specific billing entries submitted by Defendant and to argue why those entries are unreasonable. Indeed, attached to its motion is a copy of Defendant’s billing entries with numerous entries circled indicating that Plaintiff intends to challenge these entries if allowed to do so. (Doc. 75-1). Although the time in which Defendant has to respond to this motion has lapsed, Defendant has not stated whether it opposes Plaintiff’s motion to supplement. Thus, on or before December 9, 2016, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s motion. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on December 2, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?