Anderson v. Groveland Police Department et al

Filing 130

ORDER: Defendant Sheriff Gary S. Border's Motion for Entry of Judgment 124 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants Sheriff Gary S. Borders, John Moore, and Charles W. Russell, and against Plaintiff Geoffrey H. Anderson. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/27/2016. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION GEOFFREY H. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:15-cv-26-Oc-30PRL JOHN MOORE, CHARLES W. RUSSELL, SCOTT PENVOSE, and SHERIFF GARY S. BORDERS, in his official capacity, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Sheriff Gary S. Borders’ Motion for Entry of Judgment (Doc. 124). The Court, having reviewed the motion, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, concludes that Sheriff Border’s motion should be granted. On August 16, 2016, the Court entered an order (Doc. 117) granting Sheriff Borders’ summary judgment motion. (Doc. 83). The order also granted summary judgment as to Defendants John Moore and Charles Russell. 1 In entering that order, the Court neglected to direct the clerk to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants Sheriff Borders, Moore, and Russell. These Defendants are entitled to entry of a final judgment. 1 The Court denied Defendant Scott Penvose’s summary judgment motion, concluding he was not entitled to qualified immunity. The Court, however, granted Penvose’s motion to dismiss on September 14, 2016. (Doc. 123). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Defendant Sheriff Gary S. Border’s Motion for Entry of Judgment (Doc. 124) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants Sheriff Gary S. Borders, John Moore, and Charles W. Russell, and against Plaintiff Geoffrey H. Anderson. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?