Anderson v. Groveland Police Department et al

Filing 99

ORDER granting 97 Plaintiff's Motion to extend time. Plaintiff may file a dispositive motion on or before June 22, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/31/2016. (CAB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
GEOFFREY H. ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 5:15-cv-26-Oc-30PRL

JOHN MOORE, CHARLES W.
RUSSELL, JOHN FLYNN, ANDY
AULD, SCOTT PENVOSE, GARY S.
BORDERS and CITY OF GROVELAND
Defendants.

ORDER
Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff’s motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline.1
(Doc. 97). Plaintiff represents that this extension is necessary to allow him time in which to
review additional discovery ordered by this Court and then, if he chooses, file a dispositive motion.
Upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 97) is GRANTED and he may file a dispositive
motion on or before June 22, 2016.2

1

Plaintiff is reminded that under Local Rule 3.01(g), before filing a motion in a civil case (with
limited exceptions), the moving party shall confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort, and shall
file with the motion a statement certifying that the moving party has conferred with the opposing party and
state whether the parties agree on the resolution of the motion. “Pro se litigants are required to conform
to such procedural rules.” Black v. Culbertson, 470 F. App’x 737, 739 (11th Cir. 2012).
2
This date is consistent with the named officers’ current dispositive motion deadline. (See Doc.
95).

DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on May 31, 2016.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

-2-