Johnson et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER: Defendant Thor Motor Coach, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Eliciting Evidence of "Repaired" Defects 41 is GRANTED. At trial, Plaintiffs may not: (A) reference or attempt to introduce testim ony or documentary evidence about "repaired" concerns on the subject recreational vehicle (the "RV"), i.e., any concerns except for the slide-out room; or (B) elicit evidence regarding service time on "repaired" concerns and the entire service history of the RV. Plaintiffs shall redact from their trial exhibits all references and information regarding "repaired" concerns. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/30/2016. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION MICHAEL JOHNSON and KARLA JOHNSON, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 5:15-cv-85-Oc-30PRL THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., a foreign profit corporation, Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Thor Motor Coach, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Eliciting Evidence of “Repaired” Defects (Doc. 41). Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Defendant Thor Motor Coach, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Eliciting Evidence of “Repaired” Defects (Doc. 41) is GRANTED. 2. At trial, Plaintiffs may not A. reference or attempt to introduce testimony or documentary evidence about “repaired” concerns on the subject recreational vehicle (the “RV”), i.e., any concerns except for the slide-out room; or B. elicit evidence regarding service time on “repaired” concerns and the entire service history of the RV. 3. Plaintiffs shall redact from their trial exhibits all references and information regarding “repaired” concerns. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 30th day of March, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?