Lawlor v. Harris Tire Co.
Filing
13
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment 12 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter Final Default Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in the amount of $7,065.42, which represents $6,415 .42 in damages and $650 in costs. This amount shall accrue postjudgment interest at the federal statutory rate. The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. For all of which let execution issue. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/2/2015. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
CHAD LAWLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 5:15-cv-135-Oc-30PRL
HARRIS TIRE CO.,
Defendant.
________________________________/
DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Entry
of Default Final Judgment (Doc. 12). The Court, having reviewed the motion and
Plaintiff’s complaint, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, concludes that the
motion should be granted.
On March 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant alleging claims
for unpaid overtime compensation and recovery of minimum wages under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207, 216(b). On May 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed
a return of service reflecting service on Defendant through office manager Rhonda Ellis on
March 17, 2015. (Doc. 3). As of May 20, 2015, Defendant failed to answer or otherwise
respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 4). Consequently, a clerk’s default was entered
against Defendant.
(Doc. 5).
Plaintiff then sought default final judgment against
Defendant. (Doc. 10). Upon reviewing the return of service, the Court denied Plaintiff’s
motion without prejudice because it was not clear from the face of the return whether
Defendant was properly served. (Doc. 11).
Plaintiff now renews his motion for default final judgment, attaching an amended
return of service which shows that service was made upon Rhonda Ellis, an employee of
the registered agent, because service was attempted upon the registered agent pursuant to
Florida law and the registered agent was not present. (Doc. 12, Ex. A). The amended
return of service therefore demonstrates that service was properly effected on Defendant
in accordance with Florida law. See Fla. Stat. § 48.081(3)(a) (permitting service on an
employee of the registered agent for failure to comply with Florida Statutes § 48.091).
In support of the motion for default final judgment, Plaintiff submits his own
affidavit outlining the amount of unpaid overtime wages, unpaid minimum wages, and
liquidated damages owed to him as calculated under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). (Doc. 12, Ex. C).
Specifically, Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $6,415.42, constituting $2,844 in
unpaid overtime wages, $363.71 in unpaid minimum wages for the period beginning
January 7, 2015, and ending January 20, 2015, and $3,207.71 in liquidated damages.
Plaintiff also requests costs in the amount of $650, constituting $400 for the filing fee and
$250 for fees for service of process. (Id., Ex. D). Plaintiff does not seek recovery of
attorney’s fees.
Under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b), the Court
agrees that Plaintiff is entitled to damages in the amount of $6,415.42. The Court also
concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to costs in the amount of $650.
Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment (Doc. 12) is
GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk is directed to enter Final Default Judgment in favor of Plaintiff
and against Defendants in the amount of $7,065.42, which represents $6,415.42 in damages
and $650 in costs. This amount shall accrue postjudgment interest at the federal statutory
rate.
3.
The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions
as moot.
4.
For all of which let execution issue.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 2nd day of September, 2015.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?