Armstrong v. United States Government, et al.
Filing
17
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/27/2016. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, pro se,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 5:15-cv-303-Oc-30PRL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PAMELA A SCHEIDER, JONATHON F
WERSHOW, BARBARA KISSNERKATOWSKY, BRIAN LAMBERT, RIC
SCOTT, MARSHALL STRANSBURY,
SHARON DOREDANT, VINCE
ALDRIDGE, DEPARTMENT OF
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
FAMILIES, U.S. HOUSE OF
CONGRESS, U.S. SUPREME COURTS,
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
COMMISSION, KEITH PARKS,
WENDY LAUVER, NANCY STAFF and
ANN COFFIN,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte. The Court entered an Order on
January 6, 2016, which allowed Plaintiff fourteen (14) days to file a second amended
complaint provided he could state a cognizant claim for relief within the confines of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Middle District of Florida.
(Doc. 16). Plaintiff has failed to timely file a second amended complaint.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1.
This cause is dismissed without prejudice.
2.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
3.
The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of January, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\OCALA\15-cv-303 Ocala dismissal.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?