Armstrong v. United States Government, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/27/2016. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, pro se, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:15-cv-303-Oc-30PRL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PAMELA A SCHEIDER, JONATHON F WERSHOW, BARBARA KISSNERKATOWSKY, BRIAN LAMBERT, RIC SCOTT, MARSHALL STRANSBURY, SHARON DOREDANT, VINCE ALDRIDGE, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS, U.S. SUPREME COURTS, JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION, KEITH PARKS, WENDY LAUVER, NANCY STAFF and ANN COFFIN, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte. The Court entered an Order on January 6, 2016, which allowed Plaintiff fourteen (14) days to file a second amended complaint provided he could state a cognizant claim for relief within the confines of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Middle District of Florida. (Doc. 16). Plaintiff has failed to timely file a second amended complaint. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. This cause is dismissed without prejudice. 2. All pending motions are denied as moot. 3. The Clerk is directed to close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of January, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record S:\OCALA\15-cv-303 Ocala dismissal.docx 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?