PNC Bank National Association v. Wilnic Properties, LLC et al
Filing
52
ORDER directing the CLERK to enter final judgment on Counts I and II. See the order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 2/1/2017. (CAB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
PNC BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, a national banking
association, successor-by-merger with
RBC Bank (USA), a North Carolina statechartered bank, successor-by merger with
Florida Choice Bank, a Florida statechartered bank
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 5:16-cv-66-Oc-PRL
WILNIC PROPERTIES, LLC,
NICHOLAS PRZYSTAWSKI,
SUZANNE L. PRZYSTAWSKI and
CENTRAL FLORIDA FOOT CARE,
P.A.
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 18, 2017, this Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment
in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Wilnic Properties, LLC on Count I and against
Defendants Nicholas Przystawski and Suzanne L. Przystawski on Count II. (Docs. 47, 49). In
that order, the Court directed Plaintiff to file the original promissory note for cancelation, which
Plaintiff has now done (along with the note’s amendments). (Docs. 50, 51). Accordingly, the
CLERK is ORDERED to enter judgment in favor of PNC Bank National Association and against
Wilnic Properties, LLC, Nicholas Przystawski, and Suzanne L. Przystawski, jointly and severally,
in the amount of $385,829.09, 1 plus post-judgment interest as provided by law. Finally, the
CLERK is DIRECTED TO CANCEL the original promissory note and its amendments.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on February 1, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
1
This amount includes unpaid principal of $361,825.55; unpaid and accrued interest of
$19,192.97; $2,948.33 in per diem interest from November 17, 2016 through February 1, 2017 (seventyseven days at the rate of $38.29); and late fees of $1,862.24.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?