Preston v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations. The Plaintiff's 24 Objections are overruled. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all other pending motions and close the file. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 7/5/2017. (MJT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION CHRYSTAL PRESTON o/b/o THOMAS RAY BRAZEE (deceased), Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 5:16-cv-350-Oc-10PRL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER On April 28, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 23) recommending that the Commissioner’s Decision denying the Plaintiff’s claim for Disability Insurance Benefits be affirmed. The Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 24.) The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s detailed and well-reasoned report and recommendation. Simply put, the Court concludes that the Administrative Law Judge properly evaluated the medical evidence and Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”), and his findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, upon due consideration, and a de novo review of the case, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, AND MADE A PART HEREOF; (2) The Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 24) are OVERRULED; (3) Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner’s Decision denying the Plaintiff’s claim for Disability Insurance Benefits is AFFIRMED; and (4) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all other pending motions and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE and ORDERED at Ocala, Florida this 5th day of July, 2017. Copies to: Counsel of Record Hon. Philip R. Lammens Mari Jo Taylor 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?