Dilts et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 87

ORDER terminating 81 Defendant's second motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/9/2017. (AR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION ADAM M. DILTS and RACHEL M. DILTS, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 5:16-cv-453-Oc-37PRL WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant. ORDER Defendant filed its second motion to compel discovery on March 13, 2017. (Doc. 81). Because defense counsel had not conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel prior to filing the motion, I directed the parties to confer and advise the Court on or before April 3, 2017 as to what issues still remain to be resolved. (Doc. 85). On April 3, 2017, Defendant filed a notice advising that the parties had resolved a number of issues and that it would “give additional notice of a definitive and exhausting list of all issues ripe for judicial intervention promptly after receiving and analyzing Plaintiffs’ amended responses on or before April 17, 2017.” (Doc. 86). To date, Defendant has not advised the Court that any issues remain to be resolved by the Court. Accordingly, I am going to terminate Defendant’s second motion to compel. (Doc. 81) Defendant may file a renewed motion to compel if appropriate. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on May 9, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?