Dilts et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 87

ORDER terminating 81 Defendant's second motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/9/2017. (AR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
ADAM M. DILTS and RACHEL M.
DILTS,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 5:16-cv-453-Oc-37PRL

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant.

ORDER
Defendant filed its second motion to compel discovery on March 13, 2017. (Doc. 81).
Because defense counsel had not conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel prior to filing the motion, I
directed the parties to confer and advise the Court on or before April 3, 2017 as to what issues still
remain to be resolved. (Doc. 85). On April 3, 2017, Defendant filed a notice advising that the
parties had resolved a number of issues and that it would “give additional notice of a definitive
and exhausting list of all issues ripe for judicial intervention promptly after receiving and analyzing
Plaintiffs’ amended responses on or before April 17, 2017.” (Doc. 86). To date, Defendant has
not advised the Court that any issues remain to be resolved by the Court. Accordingly, I am going
to terminate Defendant’s second motion to compel. (Doc. 81) Defendant may file a renewed
motion to compel if appropriate.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on May 9, 2017.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

-2-