Seldomridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Remand. This action is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for the Commissioner to take further administrative action, subject to the requirement that the Commissioner provide the Court with status reports every three months regarding the progress of the remand process. The Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/24/2017. (JWM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
TONY SELDOMRIDGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 5:17-cv-150-Oc-GKS-PRL
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the undersigned on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw
Answer and for Remand Under Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in which Defendant requests
the Court to remand this case so that the Commissioner can take further administrative action.
(Doc. 20). Defendant states that Plaintiff has no objection to the Motion to Remand.
Pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) of the Social Security Act, this Court may
remand a case to the Commissioner on motion of the Commissioner made for “good cause shown”
before filing an answer. Here, the Commissioner has filed an answer, but now seeks to withdraw
the answer. And, Plaintiff has no objection. Further, the Commissioner submits that the Appeals
Council did not have the entire record before it at the time it issued its decision, and the claimant’s
files and the administrative transcript were incomplete as contemplated by Congress. The
Commissioner submits that the record is incomplete and this constitutes a circumstance under
which remand is appropriate under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Court agrees. See
Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 90 (1991) (observing that a district court may remand a final
decision of the Secretary as provided in sentence six “in light of additional evidence without any
substantive ruling as to the correctness of the Secretary's decision.”).
In view of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Answer and for Remand (Doc. 20) is GRANTED;
(2) This action is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence six of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g), for the Commissioner to take further administrative action, subject to the
requirement that the Commissioner provide the Court with status reports every three months
regarding the progress of the remand process; and
(3) Because this cause is remanded pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the
Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter. Accordingly, the Clerk shall administratively close
the file and withhold the entry of a final judgment in this case.
DONE and RECOMMENDED in Ocala, Florida on October 24, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Presiding District Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?