Bracey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al.

Filing 57

ORDERED: Petitioner has failed to provide good cause for this Court to alter or amend the August 31, 2020 Order. Petitioner's "Writ of Error Coram Nobis" 56, which the Court construes as a Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/7/2020. (CSS)

Download PDF
Case 5:17-cv-00364-CEH-PRL Document 57 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 326 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION VONDALE LAMAR BRACEY, Petitioner, -vs- Case No. 5:17-cv-364-Oc-36PRL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Petitioner’s “Writ of Error Coram Nobis” (Doc. 56), which the Court construes as a Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). It appears Petitioner moves the Court to reconsider its August 31, 2020, Order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 55.) Because the petition (which challenged the calculation of Petitioner’s release date) was dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, there was no formal judgment entered. “The only grounds for granting [a Rule 59] motion are newly-discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact.” Arthur v. King, 500 F.3d 1335, 1343 (11th Cir. 2007) (quoting In re Kellogg, 197 F.3d 1116, 1119 (11th Cir. 1999)). Petitioner has neither presented newly-discovered evidence nor demonstrated that the Court 1 Case 5:17-cv-00364-CEH-PRL Document 57 Filed 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 327 committed a manifest error of law or fact in dismissing his petition. The Court, therefore, concludes that Petitioner has failed to provide good cause for this Court to alter or amend the August 31, 2020 Order. 295 (M.D. Fla. 1993). See Cover v. Wal-Mart, 148 F.R.D. 294, Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 7, 2020. Copies to: Petitioner pro se Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?