Bracey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al.
Filing
57
ORDERED: Petitioner has failed to provide good cause for this Court to alter or amend the August 31, 2020 Order. Petitioner's "Writ of Error Coram Nobis" 56, which the Court construes as a Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/7/2020. (CSS)
Case 5:17-cv-00364-CEH-PRL Document 57 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 326
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
VONDALE LAMAR BRACEY,
Petitioner,
-vs-
Case No.
5:17-cv-364-Oc-36PRL
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
____________________________/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Petitioner’s “Writ of
Error Coram Nobis” (Doc. 56), which the Court construes as a Motion to Alter or
Amend a Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).
It appears Petitioner moves
the Court to reconsider its August 31, 2020, Order dismissing his petition for a writ of
habeas corpus.
(Doc. 55.)
Because the petition (which challenged the calculation
of Petitioner’s release date) was dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies, there was no formal judgment entered.
“The only grounds for granting [a Rule 59] motion are newly-discovered
evidence or manifest errors of law or fact.” Arthur v. King, 500 F.3d 1335, 1343 (11th
Cir. 2007) (quoting In re Kellogg, 197 F.3d 1116, 1119 (11th Cir. 1999)).
Petitioner
has neither presented newly-discovered evidence nor demonstrated that the Court
1
Case 5:17-cv-00364-CEH-PRL Document 57 Filed 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 327
committed a manifest error of law or fact in dismissing his petition.
The Court,
therefore, concludes that Petitioner has failed to provide good cause for this Court to
alter or amend the August 31, 2020 Order.
295 (M.D. Fla. 1993).
See Cover v. Wal-Mart, 148 F.R.D. 294,
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 7, 2020.
Copies to:
Petitioner pro se
Counsel of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?