Weinzierl v. Eno, Inc. et al

Filing 30

ORDER denying as moot 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/19/2020. (JWM)

Case 5:19-cv-00640-PRL Document 30 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 104

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
MICHAEL WEINZIERL,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 5:19-cv-640-Oc-PRL

ENO, INC. and DANNY DEE
TUNNELL,
Defendants.

ORDER
Recently, the Court directed counsel to confer pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g) regarding the
issues raised by Plaintiff's motion to compel responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. (Doc. 28).
Following their conference, the parties were directed to file a written notice advising the Court as
to whether, and to what extent, Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery required resolution by the
Court. And, the Court directed that Defendant should respond to Plaintiff’s motion on or before
November 12, 2020.
On November 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice that counsel had conferred. The notice
recites that counsel for Defendants “indicated that discovery responses would be forthcoming by
November 11, 2020, due to the recent move of his office from one location to another.” (Doc. 29).
Plaintiff also stated that Plaintiff will be deposed on November 20, and the parties have a scheduled
mediation on December 16. Plaintiff did not reassert the request for relief stated in his earlier
motion to compel, and it thus appears that the motion (Doc. 27) is due to be denied as moot.

Case 5:19-cv-00640-PRL Document 30 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 105

DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on November 19, 2020.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

-2-