Hadcock v. Jest Operating, Inc. et al

Filing 107

ORDER denying 106 Non-Party Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration's motion to quash. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/8/2021. (AR)

Case 5:20-cv-00095-JSM-PRL Document 107 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1477

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
DORIS HADCOCK,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 5:20-cv-95-Oc-30PRL

JEST OPERATING, INC., PATRICIA R.
LEININGER, MERIDETH C. NAGEL,
MICHAEL J. ROGERS, CHRISTIAN
W. WAUGH, MERIDETH NAGEL, P.A.,
WAUGH LAW, P.A., GAYLORD &
ROGERS, LLC, ELIZABETH HEIMAN
and KIMBERLY SCHULTE,
Defendants.

ORDER
On January 7, 2021, Non-Party Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration (“AHCA”)
filed its objection and moved to quash a subpoena issued by Plaintiff’s counsel. (Doc. 106). AHCA
argues that it was not given enough time to respond to the subpoena, that the requests are overly
broad, unduly burdensome, and oppressive, and that the subpoena seeks confidential information.
However, AHCA has not filed the subpoena, nor has it provided any details regarding the specific
requests, including whose medical information Plaintiff is attempting to obtain. Thus, the Court is
unable to evaluate whether the subpoena is proper. Accordingly, AHCA’s motion (Doc. 106) is
DENIED. Within seven (7) days, AHCA shall either comply with the subpoena or file a motion
providing the Court with sufficient information so that it can make a determination.

Case 5:20-cv-00095-JSM-PRL Document 107 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1478

DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on January 8, 2021.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Andrew T. Sheeran, Esq.

-2-