Bell v. Woods

Filing 42

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 34) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Defendant/judgment debtor Nathaniel Woo ds's Motion to Dissolve the Writ of Garnishment (Dkt. 20) and Motion for Nonrecognition of Foreign Judgment and Motion to Quash the Writ of Garnishment (Dkt. 21) are denied. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 2/11/2022. (SMB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
KENNETH D. BELL,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 5:20-mc-10-JSM-PRL

NATHANIEL WOODS,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation
submitted by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens (Dkt. 34), Defendant’s Objection to the
Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35), Defendant’s Amended Objection (Dkt. 39), and
Defendant’s Supplement (Dkt. 41).
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, Defendant’s Objections, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the
file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.
ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 34) of the Magistrate Judge is
adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this
Order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2.

Defendant/judgment debtor Nathaniel Woods’s Motion to Dissolve the Writ
of Garnishment (Dkt. 20) and Motion for Nonrecognition of Foreign
Judgment and Motion to Quash the Writ of Garnishment (Dkt. 21) are
denied.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 11th day of February, 2022.

Copies Furnished To:
Counsel/Parties of Record

2