Ondis v. Leider et al
Filing
32
ORDER denying 31 Motion for Clerk's Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 10/21/2021. (SA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
PAUL ONDIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 5:21-cv-466-BJD-PRL
MATTHEW B. LEIDER, CHRISTIAN
SAVIO, MYA M. HACHETTE, LAW
OFFICES OF MANDEL,
MANGANELLI & LEIDER, P.A. and
WINDERWEEDLE, HAINES, WARD
& WOODMAN, P.A.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for Clerk’s default against all
Defendants. (Doc. 31). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), “[w]hen a party
against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise
defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s
default.” Here, all Defendants have timely filed motions to dismiss (Docs. 15, 16) and have
not failed to plead or otherwise defend.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for Clerk’s default (Doc. 31) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on October 21, 2021.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?