Hicks et al v. United States Postal Service

Filing 4

ORDER re 1. Signed by Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 3/30/2006. (MDP, )

Download PDF
Hicks et al v. United States Postal Service Doc. 4 Case 6:06-cv-00360-ACC-KRS Document 4 Filed 03/30/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA O RLANDO DIVISION HAL D. HICKS, ET AL., Petitioners, -vsUNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, Respondent. ________________________________________ Case No. 6:06-cv-360-Orl-22KRS OR D E R This cause came on for consideration pursuant to a Motion to Quash Administrative Subpoenas and for Injunctive Relief (doc. no. 1) filed by Petitioners Hal D. Hicks and Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc. Upon reviewing the motion to quash, the Court has determined that the petitioners complied with subsections (a)(1) & (2) of 12 U.S.C. § 3410. Hence, the Government authority, in this case the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, is hereby ORDERED to file a sworn response to the motion to quash as it pertains to Hal D. Hicks and Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc. on or before April 7, 2006, as provided by 12 U.S.C. § 3410(b). It is further ORDERED that Suntrust Bank in Daytona Beach, FL, shall not produce documents pursuant to the subpoena with respect to open and closed accounts held in the name of Hal D. Hicks or Hal D. Hicks Mail Transportation, Inc., pending further order of the Court. Counsel for Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:06-cv-00360-ACC-KRS Document 4 Filed 03/30/2006 Page 2 of 2 the United States Postal Service shall promptly advise Suntrust Bank of the contents of this Order and provide it with a copy of this Order. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 30, 2006. Karla R. Spaulding KARLA R. SPAULDING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?