Laso v. Selectbuild, LLC
ORDER re 26 Joint MOTION to Approve Settlement and Dismiss Action with Prejudice filed by Bret Laso. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 2/9/2009. (DAH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
O RLANDO DIVISION BRET LASO, Plaintiff, -vsSELECTBUILD, LLC, Defendant. ______________________________________ Case No. 6:08-cv-450-Orl-28KRS
OR D E R
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion: MOTION: JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. No. 26) FILED: February 6, 2009
This case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. In their Joint Motion, the parties contend they have reached a settlement agreement and seek court approval of that agreement. In Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-55 (11th Cir. 1982), the Eleventh Circuit explained that claims for back wages under the FLSA may only be settled or compromised when the Department of Labor supervises the payment of back wages or when the district court enters a stipulated judgment "after scrutinizing the settlement for fairness." Id. at 1353.
The instant motion, Doc. No. 26 ¶¶ 2-7, and settlement agreement, Doc. No. 26-2, both indicate Plaintiff Laso compromised his FLSA claim.1 Under the settlement agreement, Plaintiff Laso will receive $10,100.00, less any applicable taxes and withholding. Doc. No. 26-2. Counsel for Plaintiff will receive $6,865.00 in attorney's fees and costs. Id. Counsel for Plaintiff does not indicate whether a contract between Plaintiff and counsel, or any other agreement, could reduce Plaintiff's recovery if the Court determines the amount of attorney's fees sought is not a "reasonable attorney's fee" under the FLSA. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). In addition, Plaintiff's counsel has failed to attach contemporaneously recorded time records for this case. In order to determine whether this proposed settlement is reasonable, counsel for Plaintiff must disclose the extent to which Plaintiff's FLSA claims have, will, or could be compromised by deduction of attorneys' fees, costs, or expenses, whether pursuant to a contract between Plaintiff and their counsel or otherwise. Plaintiff must also establish that the attorney's fees awarded to counsel for Plaintiff constitutes "a reasonable attorney's fee" under the FLSA. See Silva v. Miller, No. 08-12011, 2009 WL 73164 (11th Cir., Jan. 13, 2009);2 Zegers v. Countrywide Mortgage Ventures, LLC, 569 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (M.D. Fla. 2008). Plaintiff "`bears the burden of establishing entitlement and documenting the appropriate hours and hourly rates.'" ACLU v. Barnes, 168 F.3d 423, 427 (11th Cir. 1999)(quoting Norman v. Hous.
Laso did not aver any specific damages amount in his answers to Court interrogatories. Doc.
No. 9. The Court recognizes, as it has in the past, that the Eleventh Circuit's unpublished opinions represent persuasive authority, rather than binding precedent. See 11th Cir. R. 36-2 and I.O.P. 6. Although the mandate has not yet issued in the Silva case, the Court finds the opinion to be persuasive authority. -22
Auth., 836 F.2d 1292, 1303 (11th Cir. 1988)). Plaintiff may not simply aver that a particular hourly rate is reasonable, but must offer independent evidence of the type required by Norman to support the reasonableness of this hourly rate in the relevant geographic area. Such evidence may include the opinion of an expert witness3 and citation to cases in which other courts have established through an expressed lodestar analysis a reasonable hourly rate for the professional seeking fees in the relevant geographic area. "[F]ee counsel should have maintained records to show the time spent on the different claims, and the general subject matter of the time expenditures ought to be set out with sufficient particularity so that the district court can assess the time claimed for each activity." Norman v. Hous. Auth., 836 F.2d at 1303. At a minimum, this requires submission of contemporaneously recorded time records showing the individual who performed the work, the description of the tasks performed, and the number of hours worked on each task. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that on or before February 16, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff shall file: 1. A sworn declaration setting forth the precise final distribution of settlement funds, after deduction of taxes and withholding, among Plaintiff's FLSA compensation and, liquidated damages (if any), and attorney's fees including costs/expenses, after application of any fee agreement between Plaintiff and his counsel; 2. In support of his sworn declaration, counsel for Plaintiff shall file the following:
See, e.g., Banner Group Corp. v. United States, Case No. 6:06-cv-706-Orl-22KRS, Doc. No. 113-10 (expert witness declaration regarding reasonable attorneys' fees). -3-
a true and correct copy of a contemporaneously recorded time sheet detailing the work performed by counsel and other legal professionals, the individual who performed each task (with an indication of whether the individual is an attorney, paralegal, legal assistant, etc.), the hourly rate for each individual who performed any task, and the number of hours spent on each task;
a statement advising the Court whether and to what extent any fee agreement, or other agreement, between Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel could decrease Plaintiff's recovery if the Court determines that a reasonable attorney's fee under the FLSA is less than the amount sought by Plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 9, 2009.
Karla R. Spaulding
KARLA R. SPAULDING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?