Pace et al v. Hughes et al

Filing 36

ORDER denying without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g) 35 Motion to compel. A renewed motion shall comply with the requirements of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 12/4/2009. (Spaulding, Karla)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CARL P. PACE, and RASHIDA L. PACE, Plaintiffs, -vsJAMES R. HUGHES, WENDY HUGHES, AMERICAN STATES PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, AND SAFECO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendants. ________________________________________ Case No. 6:09-cv-145-Orl-35KRS ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: DEFENDANTS', JAMES R. HUGHES AND WENDY HUGHES, MOTION TO COMPEL DECEMBER 9, 2009 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PLAINTIFFS, CARL P. PACE AND RASHIDA L. PACE (Doc. No. 35) FILED: December 3, 2009 _______________________________________________________ THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. The present motion fails to certify that Defendants conferred with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised by the motion pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.01(g). In any renewed motion, Defendants shall provide the Court with a copy of the noticed independent medical examinations and the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 35(a)(2)(B). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 4, 2009. Karla R. Spaulding KARLA R. SPAULDING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?