United States of America et al v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center et al
Filing
381
ORDER granting 380 Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed Documents. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/28/2013. (ED)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
USA and ELIN BAKLID-KUNZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 6:09-cv-1002-Orl-31TBS
HALIFAX HOSPITAL MEDICAL
CENTER and HALIFAX STAFFING,
INC.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed
Documents (Doc. 380) filed by the Relator. The Relator seeks to substitute redacted versions of
certain depositions and exhibits that inadvertently included protected health information.
The
Relator also seeks to have the Clerk relink a previously filed deposition and exhibits to a docket
entry other than the one that to which it was originally linked. However, the Court believes it the
better course to remove these latter documents as well and allow the Relator to refile them along
with the others. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed Documents (Doc. 380) is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
The Clerk is directed to remove the
following documents and attached exhibits and return them to the Relator:
Deposition of George Rousis Volume I (Doc. 367) and attachments;
Deposition of George Rousis Volume II (Doc. 368) and attachments;
Deposition of George Rousis Volume III (Doc. 375) and attachments;
Deposition of Rohit Khanna (Doc. 377) and attachments;
Deposition of Patricia Aramayo (Doc. 378) and attachments.
And it is further ORDERED that the Relator may re-file properly redacted versions of
these depositions and attachments on or before November 4, 2013.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on October 28, 2013.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?