United States of America et al v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center et al

Filing 381

ORDER granting 380 Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed Documents. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/28/2013. (ED)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION USA and ELIN BAKLID-KUNZ, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:09-cv-1002-Orl-31TBS HALIFAX HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and HALIFAX STAFFING, INC., Defendants. / ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed Documents (Doc. 380) filed by the Relator. The Relator seeks to substitute redacted versions of certain depositions and exhibits that inadvertently included protected health information. The Relator also seeks to have the Clerk relink a previously filed deposition and exhibits to a docket entry other than the one that to which it was originally linked. However, the Court believes it the better course to remove these latter documents as well and allow the Relator to refile them along with the others. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Replace Inadvertently Filed Documents (Doc. 380) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Clerk is directed to remove the following documents and attached exhibits and return them to the Relator: Deposition of George Rousis Volume I (Doc. 367) and attachments; Deposition of George Rousis Volume II (Doc. 368) and attachments; Deposition of George Rousis Volume III (Doc. 375) and attachments; Deposition of Rohit Khanna (Doc. 377) and attachments; Deposition of Patricia Aramayo (Doc. 378) and attachments. And it is further ORDERED that the Relator may re-file properly redacted versions of these depositions and attachments on or before November 4, 2013. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on October 28, 2013. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?