Wells v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

ORDER Granting in part 24 Motion for attorney fees; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 25 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is awarded $4,992.67 for attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner of Social Security in the amount of $4,992.67. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 3/30/2011. (DJD)

Download PDF
Wells v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JESSICA J. WELLS, Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ______________________________________ Case No. 6:09-cv-1669-Orl-28DAB ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Uncontested Petition for Attorney's Fees (Doc. No. 24) filed March 5, 2011. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Report and Recommendation filed March 8, 2011 (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. in part. 3. Justice Act. Plaintiff is awarded $4,992.67 for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Plaintiff's Uncontested Petition for Attorney's Fees (Doc. NO. 24) is GRANTED Dockets.Justia.com 4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner of Social Security in the amount of $4,992.67. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this _30th___ day of March, 2011. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?