Satterfield v. CFI Sales & Marketing, Inc. et al
Filing
131
ORDER adopting 118 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting in part and denying in part 90 MOTION for sanctions against Certain Named Plaintiffs; denying the Motion as to Plaintiffs Pereira and Sugrim; granting the Motion as to Plaintiff Roberto Santana; dismissing the claims of Plaintiff Roberto Santana. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 5/24/2011. (BRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
RAYMOND SATTERFIELD, AND
OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
Case No. 6:09-cv-1827-Orl-28DAB
CFI SALES & MARKETING, INC.,
CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS,
INC., WESTGATE RESORTS, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Against Certain
Named Plaintiffs Who Failed to Appear at Mediation (Doc. No. 90) filed March 10, 2011. The
United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be
granted in part and denied in part.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no
objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.
That the Report and Recommendation filed May 3, 2011 (Doc. No. 118) is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Against Certain Named Plaintiffs Who Failed
to Appear at Mediation (Doc. No. 90) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion
is denied as to Plaintiffs’ Jorge Pereira and Andrew Sugrim. It is granted as to Plaintiff
Roberto Santana. The claims of Plaintiff Roberto Santana are DISMISSED.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this 24th day of May, 2011.
Copies furnished to:
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?