Khalil et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

Filing 49

ORDER Granting 45 Motion to enforce settlement agreement; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 48 Report and Recommendations. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 6/13/2012. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ATEF KHALIL, AMIRA TAWFIK, Plaintiffs, -vs- Case No. 6:10-cv-1324-Orl-28KRS JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., Defendant. ______________________________________ ORDER This case is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. No. 45) filed April 18, 2012. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted if the District Court finds that the release, as amended, does not undermine the fairness of the settlement. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Report and Recommendation filed May 25, 2012 (Doc. No. 48) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Court finds that the release agreement, as amended, does not undermine the fairness of the settlement. 3. The Court further finds that the settlement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute under the Fair Labor Standard Act. 4. The Joint Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement (Doc. No. 45) is GRANTED. 5. This case is dismissed with prejudice. 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this __13th__ day of June, 2012. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?