Health Science Distributors, Co. v. Usher-Sparks et al

Filing 68

ORDER adopting 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 62 MOTION to dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Robert Usher-Sparks, Trevor Taylor. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until November 25, 2011, to perfect service on Defendants Robert Usher-Sparks & Trevor Taylor and file proof of such service with the Court. Failure to timely file proof of service on these defendants may result in the case against them being dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/24/2011. Copies mailed.(LAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION HEALTH SCIENCE DISTRIBUTORS, CO., -vs- Case No. 6:10-cv-1797-Orl-31KRS ROBERT USHER-SPARKS; TREVOR TAYLOR; WELLSPRINGS TRADING, LTD; WELLSPRINGS LTD; and SARATI INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Defendants Robert Usher-Sparks & Trevor Taylor’s Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service, lack of personal jurisdiction, and for improper venue (Doc. No. 62) filed July 25, 2011. On October 3, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 67) recommending that the motion be denied without prejudice. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order. 2. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until November 25, 2011, to perfect service on Defendants Robert Usher-Sparks & Trevor Taylor and file proof of such service with the Court. Failure to timely file proof of service on these defendants may result in the case against them being dismissed without further notice. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on this 24th day of October, 2011. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?