Kinzer et al v. Nexus Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 41

ORDER Denying 37 Motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' first amended complaint; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 40 Report and Recommendations. Defendants shall file their Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 4/23/2012. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LEE KINZER, TONY CHIRICO, Plaintiffs, -vs- Case No. 6:11-cv-465-Orl-28KRS NEXUS ENTERPRISES, INC., THIJS STELLING, Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 37) filed January 18, 2012. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be denied. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Report and Recommendation filed March 28, 2012 (Doc. No. 40) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED. 3. Defendants shall file their Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this __23rd___ day of April, 2012. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?