Pendergraft IV v. State of Florida et al
Filing
9
ORDER denying 8 Motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 7/25/2011. (ED)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
O RLANDO D IVISION
JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, IV,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
Case No. 6:11-cv-1116-Orl-31KRS
STATE OF FLORIDA; AGENCY FOR
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION;
PAM BONDI, in her capacity as Attorney
General for the State of Florida; LAURA
MACLAFFERTY, individually and in her
capacity as Unit Manager, Bureau of Health
Facility Regulation for the Administrative
Health Care Agency; and RICHARD
SALIBA, individually and in his capacity as
Assistant General Counsel of the
Administrative Health Care Agency,
Defendants.
_______________________________________
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 8) filed by the
Plaintiff, James Pendergraft IV (“Pendergraft”). Pendergraft seeks reconsideration of this Court’s
order (Doc. 4), entered July 7, 2011, denying his motion for a temporary restraining order.
Previously, Pendergraft contended that a TRO was required because his license was set to expire
July 5, 2011. (Doc. 2 at 3). In the motion filed July 22, 2011, he contends that, based on another
document in his files, the true expiration date is July 23, 2011, requiring an immediate TRO. He
offers no explanation for his failure to uncover this document earlier, or his failure to serve the
defendants despite the Court’s order, two weeks ago, to do so. Even if these issues had been
addressed, the same lack of diligence that doomed the original effort to procure a TRO would
compel the Court to deny this motion for reconsideration.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 8) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on July 25, 2011.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?