Ivey v. Blocker et al

Filing 15

ORDER adopting 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 9 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot; 8 MOTION to amend complaint is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 2/2/2012. (LAK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
STEVEN IVEY,
Plaintiff,
-vs-

Case No. 6:11-cv-1776-Orl-22DAB

RONALD BLOCKER, SUPERINTENDENT,
TED PRICE, DERREN OAKS, JOSEPH
MCCOY, ALEX HIDELBERG, CATHERINE
VAN KIRK, ROSE KELLAM,
ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendants.
_____________________________________

ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Amend Complaint and Motion for Leave
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. Nos. 8 and 9).
The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motions
be denied.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that Plaintiff
has filed an Amended Complaint and renewed Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis in response
to the Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendations.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1.

The Report and Recommendation filed January 6, 2012 (Doc. No. 10) is

ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.

The Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 8) is denied as moot. Plaintiff filed his

Amended Complaint on February 1, 2012 (Doc. No. 13).
3.

The Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 9) is denied as moot. Plaintiff

filed his renewed Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on February 1, 2012 (Doc. No. 14).
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Orlando, Florida on February 2, 2012.

Copies furnished to:
Steven Ivey, pro se

-2-